Title:   ON SLEEP AND SLEEPLESSNESS

Subject:  

Author:   by Aristotle

Keywords:  

Creator:  

PDF Version:   1.2



Contents:

Page No 1

Page No 2

Page No 3

Page No 4

Page No 5

Page No 6

Page No 7

Page No 8

Page No 9

Bookmarks





Page No 1


ON SLEEP AND SLEEPLESSNESS

by Aristotle



Top




Page No 2


Table of Contents

ON SLEEP AND SLEEPLESSNESS ................................................................................................................1

by Aristotle..............................................................................................................................................1

1..............................................................................................................................................................1

2..............................................................................................................................................................3

3..............................................................................................................................................................4


ON SLEEP AND SLEEPLESSNESS

i



Top




Page No 3


ON SLEEP AND SLEEPLESSNESS

by Aristotle

translated by J. I. Beare

1 

2 

3  

1

WITH regard to sleep and waking, we must consider what they are:  whether they are peculiar to soul or to

body, or common to both; and  if common, to what part of soul or body they appertain: further,  from  what

cause it arises that they are attributes of animals, and  whether  all animals share in them both, or some partake

of the one  only,  others of the other only, or some partake of neither and some of  both. 

Further, in addition to these questions, we must also inquire what  the dream is, and from what cause sleepers

sometimes dream, and  sometimes do not; or whether the truth is that sleepers always dream  but do not always

remember (their dream); and if this occurs, what its  explanation is. 

Again, [we must inquire] whether it is possible or not to foresee  the future (in dreams), and if it be possible,

in what manner;  further, whether, supposing it possible, it extends only to things  to  be accomplished by the

agency of Man, or to those also of which the  cause lies in suprahuman agency, and which result from the

workings  of Nature, or of Spontaneity. 

First, then, this much is clear, that waking and sleep appertain  to the same part of an animal, inasmuch as they

are opposites, and  sleep is evidently a privation of waking. For contraries, in natural  as well as in all other

matters, are seen always to present themselves  in the same subject, and to be affections of the same: examples

arehealth and sickness, beauty and ugliness, strength and weakness,  sight and blindness, hearing and

deafness. This is also clear from the  following considerations. The criterion by which we know the waking

person to be awake is identical with that by which we know the sleeper  to be asleep; for we assume that one

who is exercising  senseperception is awake, and that every one who is awake perceives  either some external

movement or else some movement in his own  consciousness. If waking, then, consists in nothing else than

the  exercise of senseperception, the inference is clear, that the  organ,  in virtue of which animals perceive, is

that by which they  wake, when  they are awake, or sleep, when they are awake, or sleep,  when they are  asleep. 

But since the exercise of senseperception does not belong to soul  or body exclusively, then (since the

subject of actuality is in  every  case identical with that of potentiality, and what is called  senseperception, as

actuality, is a movement of the soul through  the  body) it is clear that its affection is not an affection of soul

exclusively, and that a soulless body has not the potentiality of  perception. [Thus sleep and waking are not

attributes of pure  intelligence, on the one hand, or of inanimate bodies, on the other.] 

ON SLEEP AND SLEEPLESSNESS 1



Top




Page No 4


Now, whereas we have already elsewhere distinguished what are  called  the parts of the soul, and whereas the

nutrient is, in all  living  bodies, capable of existing without the other parts, while none  of the  others can exist

without the nutrient; it is clear that sleep  and  waking are not affections of such living things as partake only

of  growth and decay, e.g. not of plants, because these have not the  faculty of senseperception, whether or

not this be capable of  separate existence; in its potentiality, indeed, and in its  relationships, it is separable. 

Likewise it is clear that [of those which either sleep or wake]  there is no animal which is always awake or

always asleep, but that  both these affections belong [alternately] to the same animals. For if  there be an

animal not endued with senseperception, it is  impossible  that this should either sleep or wake; since both

these are  affections  of the activity of the primary faculty of senseperception.  But it is  equally impossible

also that either of these two  affections should  perpetually attach itself to the same animal, e.g.  that some

species  of animal should be always asleep or always awake,  without  intermission; for all organs which have a

natural function  must lose  power when they work beyond the natural timelimit of  their working  period; for

instance, the eyes [must lose power] from  [too long  continued] seeing, and must give it up; and so it is with

the hand and  every other member which has a function. Now, if  senseperception is  the function of a special

organ, this also, if  it continues perceiving  beyond the appointed timelimit of its  continuous working period,

will  lose its power, and will do its work  no longer. Accordingly, if the  waking period is determined by this

fact, that in it senseperception  is free; if in the case of some  contraries one of the two must be  present, while

in the case of others  this is not necessary; if waking  is the contrary of sleeping, and  one of these two must be

present to  every animal: it must follow  that the state of sleeping is necessary.  Finally, if such affection is

Sleep, and this is a state of  powerlessness arising from excess of  waking, and excess of waking is  in its origin

sometimes morbid,  sometimes not, so that the  powerlessness or dissolution of activity  will be so or not; it is

inevitable that every creature which wakes  must also be capable of  sleeping, since it is impossible that it

should continue actualizing  its powers perpetually. 

So, also, it is impossible for any animal to continue always  sleeping. For sleep is an affection of the organ of

senseperceptiona sort of tie or inhibition of function imposed on  it, so that every creature that sleeps must

needs have the organ of  senseperception. Now, that alone which is capable of senseperception  in actuality

has the faculty of senseperception; but to realize  this  faculty, in the proper and unqualified sense, is

impossible while  one  is asleep. All sleep, therefore, must be susceptible of awakening.  Accordingly, almost

all other animals are clearly observed to  partake  in sleep, whether they are aquatic, aerial, or terrestrial,  since

fishes of all kinds, and molluscs, as well as all others which  have  eyes, have been seen sleeping. 'Hardeyed'

creatures and  insects  manifestly assume the posture of sleep; but the sleep of all  such  creatures is of brief

duration, so that often it might well  baffle  one's observation to decide whether they sleep or not. Of

testaceous  animals, on the contrary, no direct sensible evidence is as  yet  forthcoming to determine whether

they sleep, but if the above  reasoning be convincing to any one, he who follows it will admit  this  [viz. that

they do so.] 

That, therefore, all animals sleep may be gathered from these  considerations. For an animal is defined as such

by its possessing  senseperception; and we assert that sleep is, in a certain way, an  inhibition of function, or,

as it were, a tie, imposed on  senseperception, while its loosening or remission constitutes the  being awake.

But no plant can partake in either of these affections,  for without senseperception there is neither sleeping

nor waking. But  creatures which have senseperception have likewise the feeling of  pain and pleasure, while

those which have these have appetite as well;  but plants have none of these affections. A mark of this is that

the  nutrient part does its own work better when (the animal) is asleep  than when it is awake. Nutrition and

growth are then especially  promoted, a fact which implies that creatures do not need  senseperception to

assist these processes. 


ON SLEEP AND SLEEPLESSNESS

ON SLEEP AND SLEEPLESSNESS 2



Top




Page No 5


2

We must now proceed to inquire into the cause why one sleeps and  wakes, and into the particular nature of

the senseperception, or  senseperceptions, if there be several, on which these affections  depend. Since, then,

some animals possess all the modes of  senseperception, and some not all, not, for example, sight, while all

possess touch and taste, except such animals as are imperfectly  developed, a class of which we have already

treated in our work on the  soul; and since an animal when asleep is unable to exercise, in the  simple sense

any particular sensory faculty whatever, it follows  that  in the state called sleep the same affection must

extend to all  the  special senses; because, if it attaches itself to one of them  but not  to another, then an animal

while asleep may perceive with  the latter;  but this is impossible. 

Now, since every sense has something peculiar, and also something  common; peculiar, as, e.g. seeing is to

the sense of sight, hearing to  the auditory sense, and so on with the other senses severally; while  all are

accompanied by a common power, in virtue whereof a person  perceives that he sees or hears (for, assuredly,

it is not by the  special sense of sight that one sees that he sees; and it is not by  mere taste, or sight, or both

together that one discerns, and has  the  faculty of discerning, that sweet things are different from  white  things,

but by a faculty connected in common with all the organs  of  sense; for there is one sensory function, and the

controlling  sensory  faculty is one, though differing as a faculty of perception in  relation to each genus of

sensibles, e.g. sound or colour); and  since  this [common sensory activity] subsists in association chiefly  with

the faculty of touch (for this can exist apart from all the other  organs of sense, but none of them can exist

apart from ita subject of  which we have treated in our speculations concerning the Soul); it  is  therefore

evident that waking and sleeping are an affection of this  [common and controlling organ of

senseperception]. This explains  why  they belong to all animals, for touch [with which this common  organ is

chiefly connected], alone, [is common] to all [animals]. 

For if sleeping were caused by the special senses having each and  all undergone some affection, it would be

strange that these senses,  for which it is neither necessary nor in a manner possible to  realize  their powers

simultaneously, should necessarily all go idle  and become  motionless simultaneously. For the contrary

experience,  viz. that they  should not go to rest altogether, would have been  more reasonably  anticipated. But,

according to the explanation just  given, all is  quite clear regarding those also. For, when the sense  organ

which  controls all the others, and to which all the others are  tributary,  has been in some way affected, that

these others should  be all  affected at the same time is inevitable, whereas, if one of the  tributaries becomes

powerless, that the controlling organ should  also  become powerless need in no wise follow. 

It is indeed evident from many considerations that sleep does not  consist in the mere fact that the special

senses do not function or  that one does not employ them; and that it does not consist merely  in  an inability to

exercise the senseperceptions; for such is what  happens in cases of swooning. A swoon means just such

impotence of  perception, and certain other cases of unconsciousness also are of  this nature. Moreover,

persons who have the bloodvessels in the neck  compressed become insensible. But sleep supervenes when

such  incapacity of exercise has neither arisen in some casual organ of  sense, nor from some chance cause, but

when, as has been just  stated,  it has its seat in the primary organ with which one  perceives objects  in general.

For when this has become powerless all  the other sensory  organs also must lack power to perceive; but when

one of them has  become powerless, it is not necessary for this also to  lose its power. 

We must next state the cause to which it is due, and its quality  as an affection. Now, since there are several

types of cause (for we  assign equally the 'final', the 'efficient', the 'material', and the  'formal' as causes), in the

first place, then, as we assert that  Nature operates for the sake of an end, and that this end is a good;  and that

to every creature which is endowed by nature with the power  to move, but cannot with pleasure to itself move

always and  continuously, rest is necessary and beneficial; and since, taught by  experience, men apply to sleep

this metaphorical term, calling it a  'rest' [from the strain of movement implied in senseperception]: we


ON SLEEP AND SLEEPLESSNESS

2 3



Top




Page No 6


conclude that its end is the conservation of animals. But the waking  state is for an animal its highest end,

since the exercise of  senseperception or of thought is the highest end for all beings to  which either of these

appertains; inasmuch as these are best, and  the  highest end is what is best: whence it follows that sleep

belongs of  necessity to each animal. I use the term 'necessity' in its  conditional sense, meaning that if an

animal is to exist and have  its  own proper nature, it must have certain endowments; and, if  these are  to belong

to it, certain others likewise must belong to it  [as their  condition.] 

The next question to be discussed is that of the kind of movement  or  action, taking place within their bodies,

from which the affection  of waking or sleeping arises in animals. Now, we must assume that  the  causes of

this affection in all other animals are identical  with, or  analogous to, those which operate in sanguineous

animals; and  that the  causes operating in sanguineous animals generally are  identical with  those operating in

man. Hence we must consider the  entire subject in  the light of these instances [afforded by  sanguineous

animals,  especially man]. Now, it has been definitely  settled already in  another work that senseperception in

animals  originates ill the same  part of the organism in which movement  originates. This locus of  origination

is one of three determinate  loci, viz. that which lies  midway between the head and the abdomen.  This is

sanguineous animals  is the region of the heart; for all  sanguineous animals have a heart;  and from this it is

that both motion  and the controlling  senseperception originate. Now, as regards  movement, it is obvious  that

that of breathing and of the cooling  process generally takes its  rise there; and it is with a view to the

conservation of the [due  amount of] heat in this part that nature  has formed as she has both  the animals which

respire, and those  which cool themselves by  moisture. Of this [cooling process] per se we  shall treat

hereafter.  In bloodless animals, and insects, and such  as do not respire, the  'connatural spirit' is seen

alternately  puffed up and subsiding in the  part which is in them analogous [to the  region of the heart in

sanguineous animals]. This is clearly  observable in the holoptera  [insects with undivided wings] as wasps  and

bees; also in flies and  such creatures. And since to move  anything, or do anything, is  impossible without

strength, and  holding the breath produces  strengthin creatures which inhale, the  holding of that breath which

comes from without, but, in creatures  which do not respire, of that  which is connatural (which explains  why

winged insects of the class  holoptera, when they move, are  perceived to make a humming noise, due  to the

friction of the  connatural spirit colliding with the  diaphragm); and since movement  is, in every animal,

attended with some  senseperception, either  internal or external, in the primary organ of  sense, [we conclude]

accordingly that if sleeping and waking are  affections of this  organ, the place in which, or the organ in which,

sleep and waking  originate, is selfevident [being that in which  movement and  senseperception originate,

viz. the heart]. 

Some persons move in their sleep, and perform many acts like  waking acts, but not without a phantasm or an

exercise of  senseperception; for a dream is in a certain way a  senseimpression.  But of them we have to

speak later on. Why it is  that persons when  aroused remember their dreams, but do not remember  these acts

which  are like waking acts, has been already explained in  the work 'Of  Problems'. 

3

The point for consideration next in order to the preceding  is:What are the processes in which the affection of

waking and  sleeping originates, and whence do they arise? Now, since it is when  it has senseperception that

an animal must first take food and  receive growth, and in all cases food in its ultimate form is, in  sanguineous

animals, the natural substance blood, or, in bloodless  animals, that which is analogous to this; and since the

veins are  the  place of the blood, while the origin of these is the heartan  assertion which is proved by

anatomyit is manifest that, when the  external nutriment enters the parts fitted for its reception, the

evaporation arising from it enters into the veins, and there,  undergoing a change, is converted into blood, and

makes its way to  their source [the heart]. We have treated of all this when  discussing  the subject of nutrition,

but must here recapitulate what  was there  said, in order that we may obtain a scientific view of the  beginnings

of the process, and come to know what exactly happens to  the primary  organ of senseperception to account


ON SLEEP AND SLEEPLESSNESS

3 4



Top




Page No 7


for the occurrence of  waking and  sleep. For sleep, as has been shown, is not any given  impotence of the

perceptive faculty; for unconsciousness, a certain  form of asphyxia,  and swooning, all produce such

impotence. Moreover  it is an  established fact that some persons in a profound trance  have still had  the

imaginative faculty in play. This last point,  indeed, gives rise  to a difficulty; for if it is conceivable that  one

who had swooned  should in this state fall asleep, the phantasm  also which then  presented itself to his mind

might be regarded as a  dream. Persons,  too, who have fallen into a deep trance, and have come  to be regarded

as dead, say many things while in this condition. The  same view,  however, is to be taken of all these cases,

[i.e. that they  are not  cases of sleeping or dreaming]. 

As we observed above, sleep is not coextensive with any and every  impotence of the perceptive faculty, but

this affection is one which  arises from the evaporation attendant upon the process of nutrition.  The matter

evaporated must be driven onwards to a certain point,  then  turn back, and change its current to and fro, like a

tiderace in  a  narrow strait. Now, in every animal the hot naturally tends to  move  [and carry other things]

upwards, but when it has reached the  parts  above [becoming cool], it turns back again, and moves  downwards

in a  mass. This explains why fits of drowsiness are  especially apt to come  on after meals; for the matter, both

the liquid  and the corporeal,  which is borne upwards in a mass, is then of  considerable quantity.  When,

therefore, this comes to a stand it  weighs a person down and  causes him to nod, but when it has actually  sunk

downwards, and by its  return has repulsed the hot, sleep comes  on, and the animal so  affected is presently

asleep. A confirmation  of this appears from  considering the things which induce sleep; they  all, whether

potable  or edible, for instance poppy, mandragora,  wine, darnel, produce a  heaviness in the head; and persons

borne  down [by sleepiness] and  nodding [drowsily] all seem affected in  this way, i.e. they are unable  to lift

up the head or the eyelids.  And it is after meals especially  that sleep comes on like this, for  the evaporation

from the foods  eaten is then copious. It also  follows certain forms of fatigue; for  fatigue operates as a solvent,

and the dissolved matter acts, if not  cold, like food prior to  digestion. Moreover, some kinds of illness  have

this same effect;  those arising from moist and hot secretions, as  happens with  feverpatients and in cases of

lethargy. Extreme youth  also has this  effect; infants, for example, sleep a great deal,  because of the  food

being all borne upwardsa mark whereof appears in  the  disproportionately large size of the upper parts

compared with the  lower during infancy, which is due to the fact that growth  predominates in the direction of

the former. Hence also they are  subject to epileptic seizures; for sleep is like epilepsy, and, in a  sense,

actually is a seizure of this sort. Accordingly, the  beginning  of this malady takes place with many during

sleep, and their  subsequent habitual seizures occur in sleep, not in waking hours.  For  when the spirit

[evaporation] moves upwards in a volume, on its  return  downwards it distends the veins, and forcibly

compresses the  passage  through which respiration is effected. This explains why wines  are not  good for

infants or for wet nurses (for it makes no  difference,  doubtless, whether the infants themselves, or their

nurses, drink  them), but such persons should drink them [if at all]  diluted with  water and in small quantity.

For wine is spirituous,  and of all wines  the dark more so than any other. The upper parts,  in infants, are so

filled with nutriment that within five months  [after birth] they do  not even turn the neck [sc. to raise the

head]; for in them, as in  persons deeply intoxicated, there is ever  a large quantity of moisture  ascending. It is

reasonable, too, to  think that this affection is the  cause of the embryo's remaining at  rest in the womb at first.

Also, as  a general rule, persons whose  veins are inconspicuous, as well as  those who are dwarflike, or  have

abnormally large heads, are addicted  to sleep. For in the  former the veins are narrow, so that it is not  easy for

the moisture  to flow down through them; while in the case of  dwarfs and those whose  heads are abnormally

large, the impetus of the  evaporation upwards  is excessive. Those [on the contrary] whose veins  are large are,

thanks to the easy flow through the veins, not addicted  to sleep,  unless, indeed, they labour under some other

affection which  counteracts [this easy flow]. Nor are the 'atrabilious' addicted to  sleep, for in them the inward

region is cooled so that the quantity of  evaporation in their case is not great. For this reason they have  large

appetites, though spare and lean; for their bodily condition  is  as if they derived no benefit from what they eat.

The dark bile,  too,  being itself naturally cold, cools also the nutrient tract, and  the  other parts wheresoever

such secretion is potentially present  [i.e.  tends to be formed]. 


ON SLEEP AND SLEEPLESSNESS

3 5



Top




Page No 8


Hence it is plain from what has been said that sleep is a sort of  concentration, or natural recoil, of the hot

matter inwards [towards  its centre], due to the cause above mentioned. Hence restless movement  is a marked

feature in the case of a person when drowsy. But where  it  [the heat in the upper and outer parts] begins to fail,

he grows  cool,  and owing to this cooling process his eyelids droop.  Accordingly [in  sleep] the upper and

outward parts are cool, but the  inward and lower,  i.e. the parts at the feet and in the interior of  the body, are

hot. 

Yet one might found a difficulty on the facts that sleep is most  oppressive in its onset after meals, and that

wine, and other such  things, though they possess heating properties, are productive of  sleep, for it is not

probable that sleep should be a process of  cooling while the things that cause sleeping are themselves hot. Is

the explanation of this, then, to be found in the fact that, as the  stomach when empty is hot, while

replenishment cools it by the  movement it occasions, so the passages and tracts in the head are  cooled as the

'evaporation' ascends thither? Or, as those who have hot  water poured on them feel a sudden shiver of cold,

just so in the case  before us, may it be that, when the hot substance ascends, the cold  rallying to meet it cools

[the aforesaid parts] deprives their  native  heat of all its power, and compels it to retire? Moreover, when

much  food is taken, which [i.e. the nutrient evaporation from which]  the  hot substance carries upwards, this

latter, like a fire when fresh  logs are laid upon it, is itself cooled, until the food has been  digested. 

For, as has been observed elsewhere, sleep comes on when the  corporeal element [in the 'evaporation']

conveyed upwards by the  hot,  along the veins, to the head. But when that which has been thus  carried up can

no longer ascend, but is too great in quantity [to do  so], it forces the hot back again and flows downwards.

Hence it is  that men sink down [as they do in sleep] when the heat which tends  to  keep them erect (man

alone, among animals, being naturally erect)  is  withdrawn; and this, when it befalls them, causes

unconsciousness, and  afterwards phantasy. 

Or are the solutions thus proposed barely conceivable accounts of  the refrigeration which takes place, while,

as a matter of fact, the  region of the brain is, as stated elsewhere, the main determinant of  the matter? For the

brain, or in creatures without a brain that  which  corresponds to it, is of all parts of the body the coolest.

Therefore,  as moisture turned into vapour by the sun's heat is, when  it has  ascended to the upper regions,

cooled by the coldness of the  latter,  and becoming condensed, is carried downwards, and turned  into water

once more; just so the excrementitious evaporation, when  carried up by  the heat to the region of the brain, is

condensed into a  'phlegm'  (which explains why catarrhs are seen to proceed from the  head); while  that

evaporation which is nutrient and not unwholesome,  becoming  condensed, descends and cools the hot. The

tenuity or  narrowness of  the veins about the brain itself contributes to its  being kept cool,  and to its not

readily admitting the evaporation.  This, then, is a  sufficient explanation of the cooling which takes  place,

despite the  fact that the evaporation is exceedingly hot. 

A person awakes from sleep when digestion is completed: when the  heat, which had been previously forced

together in large quantity  within a small compass from out the surrounding part, has once more  prevailed, and

when a separation has been effected between the more  corporeal and the purer blood. The finest and purest

blood is that  contained in the head, while the thickest and most turbid is that in  the lower parts. The source of

all the blood is, as has been stated  both here and elsewhere, the heart. Now of the chambers in the heart  the

central communicates with each of the two others. Each of the  latter again acts as receiver from each,

respectively, of the two  vessels, called the 'great' and the 'aorta'. It is in the central  chamber that the

[abovementioned] separation takes place. To go  into  these matters in detail would, however, be more

properly the  business  of a different treatise from the present. Owing to the fact  that the  blood formed after the

assimilation of food is especially  in need of  separation, sleep [then especially] occurs [and lasts]  until the

purest part of this blood has been separated off into the  upper parts  of the body, and the most turbid into the

lower parts.  When this has  taken place animals awake from sleep, being released  from the  heaviness

consequent on taking food. We have now stated the  cause of  sleeping, viz. that it consists in the recoil by the

corporeal  element, upborne by the connatural heat, in a mass upon  the primary  senseorgan; we have also


ON SLEEP AND SLEEPLESSNESS

3 6



Top




Page No 9


stated what sleep is, having  shown that it  is a seizure of the primary senseorgan, rendering it  unable to

actualize its powers; arising of necessity (for it is  impossible for  an animal to exist if the conditions which

render it an  animal be not  fulfilled), i.e. for the sake of its conservation; since  remission of  movement tends to

the conservation of animals. 

THE END 


ON SLEEP AND SLEEPLESSNESS

3 7



Top





Bookmarks



1. Table of Contents, page = 3

2. ON SLEEP AND SLEEPLESSNESS, page = 4

   3. by Aristotle, page = 4

   4.  1, page = 4

   5.  2, page = 6

   6.  3, page = 7